Illuminated DNA sculpture

DNA of Art

↓ Reflections ↓
↓ Reflections ↓

Visual Observations:

  • Items click into place for view
  • Styling is consistent across pages
  • Uppermost parent is hidden away, not in the main gallery view
  • Name made of name+parent1+parent2
  • Visually be able to see what attribute are from which parent

Thoughts:

  • This website itself is art, not just the generated image, but the process and evolution/algorithm is part of the art
  • Idea of exploring visual variation through "breeding"
  • Ability to "trace" down the ancestor is very interesting because it allows for a deeper understanding of the creative process as I can see what they inherited from their "parents" (forms, colors, textures)
  • In the small scale perspective, it is interesting to see them individually and trace them. But when put together into a whole gallery, it is easy to lose track and individuality and uniqueness of each piece

Thoughts

Thoughts & Reflections

This begs the questions:

  • How is art made from other arts? How does this relate to modern-day copyrights, etc.?
  • Where did art come from? Is it Adam and Eve?
  • How do you decide on the "optimal state" for art? (Artist choose some and "freeze" them)

Questions

↓ Summary ↓

Overall Experience

Overall very visual, stimulating, and engaging. I thought it was very smart to use genes to describe art. The layout of the website is clean and easy to navigate. I'm impressed by the way the website presents the evolution of art through this "breeding" process. Through visuals (the double helix) and the ability to dive deep into lineage of each piece, it creates an engaging experience that shows the influence of algorithm and manual selections (artist and public curation) in art.